In recent days and months new “currencies” have garnered lots of attention.  Led by Bitcoin, these cryptocurrencies have been frequently involved in speculative investment transactions, ALL without any of the traditional support or regulation found in real national currencies.  Should you take a chance and accept them as payment for your home when you sell?  Read on for good information and advice!


Recent financial-market hype around cryptocurrencies is partly driven by the value

of promising innovations stemming from blockchain technology, not necessarily from

future value of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies.

Cryptocurrency mining requires enormous amounts of computing power and energy,

leading to controversies around environmental impacts, especially as Bitcoin circulation

approaches its limit.

New emerging cryptocurrencies are attempting to address issues of scalability,

interoperability, and governance.

The Japan Financial Services Authority’s 2017 clarification of rules and protections in

virtual-currency exchanges has heightened demand for Bitcoins.

While Bitcoin is assigned a currency by its user base, the Internal Revenue Service

considers it a property and thus taxes all exchanges, even for other currencies or real


The proliferation of cryptocurrencies will continue as blockchain technology finds

applications in many industries, including real estate.

The volatility of Bitcoins and the IRS’s treatment of them as a taxable exchange will

limit their mainstream appeal or use in real estate transactions.

Despite the rise of cryptocurrencies, and particularly the hype around Bitcoin, a general

understanding of what it is and why its value has increased tremendously over the last few

months remains opaque. The following analysis attempts to provide some basic information about

cryptocurrencies, with an emphasis on Bitcoin, and the technology that allows the proliferation of

cryptocurrencies, which is called blockchain. Lastly, we address how Bitcoin may affect the U.S.

real estate market.

When discussing the recent hype around cryptocurrencies, it is critical to understand that while

blockchain technology enabled rise of them, speculative market euphoria can be viewed with

skepticism. Part of the financial-market hype is driven by the future value of promising innovations

stemming from blockchain technology, not necessarily from the future value of Bitcoin or some

other cryptocurrencies that have gained interest such as Ethereum and Litecoin.

What Are Cryptocurrencies?

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin are most frequently defined as “a peer-to-peer, decentralized,

digital currency whose implementation relies on the principles of cryptography to validate the

transactions and generation of the currency itself.” Peer-to-peer and decentralization are intended

to ensure that exchanges do not require a third party such as a bank and are not governed by any

bodies such as a treasury department, a central bank, or a country.

The role of cryptography is to guarantee the security of the transaction and to generate new

Bitcoins. New Bitcoins are created through a process called mining, in which computers solve

complicated mathematical problems. Once a problem is solved, a new Bitcoin is generated and is

assigned a digital signature that guarantees its authenticity and uniqueness. The solution or key

goes into the blockchain, an electronic distributed ledger, which cannot be faked since each new

key must be confirmed by other independent miners. The validation ensures that there is no fraud

and double-spending. Every Bitcoin includes a blockchain, an anonymous digital record of the

unit’s transaction history.

However, as more and more people mine Bitcoins, the cryptographic codes get longer and

more complicated. Hence, the growing popularity of cryptocurrencies and trading has led

to controversies around their environmental impacts. Mining requires enormous amounts of

computing power and energy; Bitcoin’s computing network has grown at an 1,100 percent

average annual pace over the last five years. At the current growth rate, Bitcoin would use more

electricity than the entire world uses today by 2020. Since most of this mining goes on in China,

where energy is mostly derived from coal, the environmental implications could be disastrous.

Furthermore, as the number of Bitcoins in circulation approaches its limit of 21 million, minting

algorithms are increasingly more difficult and demand greater energy sources.

Energy demand is one of the biggest pitfalls of Bitcoin and the reason that some other

cryptocurrencies are gaining momentum. The appeal of Ethereum, for example, is that it differs

from Bitcoin in the way new coins are created, which requires less computing resources by giving

mining power proportional to the number of coins already held by a miner. With Bitcoin, the first

miner to solve a block transaction problem gets a coin. While Ethereum’s mining process may

lead to distributional inequality issues since those who own more can theoretically mine more,

the proliferation of cryptocurrencies illustrates the desire to overcome constraints with existing

methods: scalability, interoperability, and governance issues. Since Bitcoin governance is decided

primarily by miners and the core development team, greater adoption as a store of value in the

traditional finance structure may hinge on some clarification from regulators such as the U.S.

Securities and Exchange Commission.

Japan is a leader when comes to cryptocurrencies, a reflection of its deep history with Bitcoin.

The technology was supposedly invented by a Japanese person or group of people called Satoshi

Nakamoto, though the inventor’s identity remains a mystery. Nevertheless, in 2017, the Japanese

government passed an act legally clarifying Bitcoin as an asset that can be used as a method of

payment, though it has not yet declared it a legal currency. The Japan Financial Services Authority

was granted the ability to regulate and license virtual-currency exchanges in Japan. This was

especially important, as it established an official Bitcoin market in Japan, where the rules are clear

and consumers can be protected. This in part helped increase demand for Bitcoin and other virtual

currencies. Japanese yen still represents 50 percent of national currencies that are traded for


Nevertheless, the question remains whether Bitcoin is money or an asset. The classic economist’s

definition holds that there are three functions of money: a medium of exchange, a store of value,

and a unit of account. And while all three measures have already been prescribed to Bitcoin,

cryptocurrency still has many obstacles to overcome to ensure its viability and longevity. As a

store of value, Bitcoin still makes a difficult case, since its daily average variation in value is more

than 4 percent. By comparison, while the U.S. dollar’s value also varies, the average daily variance

is only 0.3 percent, and the largest-ever one-day change in the dollar was less than 2 percent.

Despite its wide variation in value, Bitcoin has gained popularity as medium of exchange in

countries where local currencies are even more volatile or where a lack of conventional banking

services and stability create a productive market for Bitcoin. South Africa, for example, has seen a

surge in Bitcoin trading. It would be remiss not to mention that Bitcoin has long been popular as

a money-laundering and terrorism-financing mechanism and a way to circumvent reliance on the

U.S. dollar and involvement of banks that are required to report transactions.

Potential Impacts on the Housing Market

Going forward, it appears that Bitcoin or some other cryptocurrency will increase its function as

a medium of exchange. In 2017, companies started accepting Bitcoins for payments, and more

are expected to do so in 2018. Also, the further explosion of cryptocurrencies is very likely, as

blockchain technology permeates a greater number of industries and finds more applications.

Blockchain has the potential to be quite disruptive in real estate services, with the biggest impact

on providers of title insurance. In some countries, the technology has already been employed for

land-titling registry.

Nevertheless, the use of Bitcoins as a currency in real estate transactions still has many obstacles.

First, the IRS does not view Bitcoins as currency. Instead, they are treated as property and are

subject to capital-gains taxes. Thus, when someone purchases something with Bitcoins, the IRS

views the transaction as selling Bitcoins to obtain dollars, and when property is sold (Bitcoins in

this case), it must be reported on a tax return. Also, if the value of Bitcoins changed from the time

a user obtained them to the time they “sold” them, they must pay a capital-gains tax. Furthermore,

the recently passed tax-reform package limited exemption of 1031 exchanges to “real property”

only. Thus all “property” transactions — including digital currency exchanges for other currencies,

dollars, or physical goods — are now taxable events. This could be one of the bigger issues holding

back the mainstream appeal of Bitcoin going forward.

Furthermore, given Bitcoin’s volatility as a store of value, real estate service providers such as

escrow businesses and lenders are still reluctant to accept it for home transactions, especially

since typical closings take around 30 days, a period in which Bitcoins’ value can vary greatly. There

have been some accounts of real estate transactions conducted with Bitcoins, but it appears that

the Bitcoins were exchanged to dollars then back to Bitcoins after the sale. Thus, the transactions

were not really financed in cryptocurrency. Also,

in accounts of individuals who chose to accept

Bitcoins as an all-cash transaction, the motivation

was solely driven by the desire to own Bitcoins.

Real estate brokers that engaged in transactions

with Bitcoins charged a premium to cover the extra

costs of ensuring that all parties and exchanges

accounted for the currency volatility.

In closing, here is an image captured in Los Angeles

recently. For many, it may resemble the moment

during the 2008 housing market peak when

everyone was claiming a stake in real estate, even

though many shouldn’t have.

In short, this Realtor, who previously spent 25 years as a banker, has one word of advice: NEVER!

Need help on any subject in real estate? Give us a call! We’d love to hear from you and provide you the assistance you seek. Numbers: Peter: (415) 279-6466; Jane: (415) 531-4091.